main
John Lauer aiflow run board-claude-opus-5-5-20261108-1620: test-plan 1ba05be 1d ago

AI Flow run: claude-opus-5-5 on the board

Running: step test-plan, 15.8 min of AI time since the prompt (15.8 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.

Prompt at 2026-11-08T16:20:00Z (UTC). Flow: board. Every number here is from the run's append-only ledger (run.jsonl). AI time is the time the AI was working on a prompt: from the human's prompt to the AI's done, with any gap over 15 min where no command ran (unobserved, not proven idle) cut out.

Sessions

One row per human prompt: the AI's time on it, unobserved gaps excluded by the heuristic, which may include external AI work.

Session Prompt at Done at AI time min Unobserved gap min What
1 2026-11-08T16:20:00Z (open) 15.8 0 the first prompt
all 15.8

Per step

AI time only, the idle cut out.

Step AI min AI thinking min Tool min Turns Visits Returns Longest think
intake 13.2 13.2 0.0 1 1 0 13.1 min
design 1.1 0.1 1.1 5 1 0 0.1 min
rules 0.9 0.8 0.1 2 1 0 0.8 min
test-plan 0.5 0.0 0.5 1 1 0 0.0 min
total 15.8 14.2 1.6

Decisions along the way

  • 2026-11-08T16:33:15Z clip-start:rules-1
  • 2026-11-08T16:35:08Z clip-start:design-1
  • 2026-11-08T16:35:46Z clip-start:test-plan-1

Where the board stands

The steps on camera

One clip per step visit, sped up 10x, with the editor at the start and the end of the visit. A caption above every clip and screenshot says what it shows.

rules

What this step does:

Clip: rules, the PCB editor from 2026-11-08T16:33:15Z to 2026-11-08T16:34:12Z. Motion only: 0.9 min of real time, 41 s of it had something moving; the clock in the corner is the real elapsed time.

Contact sheet: nine frames spread through the rules clip, what the camera saw.

nine frames of rules

Screenshot: the board when rules began.

the board when rules began

Screenshot: the board when rules ended.

the board when rules ended

design

What this step does:

Clip: design, the PCB editor from 2026-11-08T16:35:08Z to 2026-11-08T16:35:19Z. Motion only: 0.2 min of real time, 8 s of it had something moving; the clock in the corner is the real elapsed time.

Contact sheet: nine frames spread through the design clip, what the camera saw.

nine frames of design

Screenshot: the board when design began.

the board when design began

Screenshot: the board when design ended.

the board when design ended

test-plan

What this step does:

Clip: test-plan, still recording (started 2026-11-08T16:35:46Z); it appears here when the step ends.

Screenshot: the board when test-plan began.

the board when test-plan began

Plan usage, the second cost line

Percent of each plan limit used, as the provider reports it, at the start of the run and at its end.

Provider Limit At start At end Used by this run
antigravity 3p week 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
antigravity week 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
claude Fable 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
claude week 8.00 % 8.00 % 0.00 %
codex week 1.00 % 1.00 % 0.00 %

The limits are per account, not per run: every AI thread signed in as this user draws on the same numbers, so a run made while other threads were working shows their usage too. Read it as an upper bound unless this run was the only thread active.

Google Antigravity: tokens, quota and cost

0 model calls: 0 fresh input, 0 cached input and 0 output tokens. The run used 0.00 % of the weekly limit, about $0.00 of a $199.99/month plan.

Step Calls Fresh input Cached input Output

Token counts are the difference of Antigravity's own per-call records (its conversation files) between step snapshots; exact when nothing else used Antigravity during the run.

Given back

0 issue(s) or PR(s) filed by this run's AI to make the tool better for every Adom user.

Adom processes PRs within minutes during business hours: a non-stop PR intake runs all day.