Parent skill: adom-wiki-skillpack

Wiki repo archetypes — pick one before you publish

Three repo shapes have emerged from heavy real-world use of the Adom Wiki. Naming them makes the choice deliberate instead of accidental. Decide which one a new thing is before you create the page, because the layout, naming, and publish flow differ.

1. Page — one page = one thing

A single wiki page for a single app, tool, skill, or doc. Two sub-variants by source visibility (see wiki-visibility):

  • Open-source Page — source public + installable. e.g. chip-fetcher, adom-usb. MIT, contributions welcome.
  • Closed-source Page — source private, releases/adompkg public → install the compiled app, can't read the code. e.g. hydrogen-desktop, adom-desktop. Uses the private readme.

Page type vs archetype. Every page has a type (app | skill | component) — orthogonal to these archetypes. A component (a chip, molecule, or board) is normally the Page archetype, and chip families use the Family archetype. Publishing a component has its own rich rules → see wiki-component.

2. Skillpack — one repo, one main skill + N sub-skills

One repo, one installable package, that carries a whole set of skills installed together by a single adompkg install. The sub-skills are files under skills/, not separately published pages. Convention: the slug ends in -skillpack so the class is recognizable in the grid and in ~/.claude/skills/.

  • Examples: adom-ui-design (grandfathered — predates the suffix), and this pack, adom-wiki-skillpack.
  • Build it → wiki-skillpack.

3. Family — an anchor page + separately-published children

A parent ("anchor") page plus multiple children published as their own pages, joined not by living in one repo but by convention:

  • Slug: <parent>-<descriptor> (e.g. adom-usb-sniffer-cdc).

  • Title: leads with the parent — Adom USB - CDC serial sniffer (plain ASCII hyphen, never em-dash) — because cards/search/screensaver show the title, and nobody reads slugs.

  • Family tag: <parent>-plugin so the anchor's discovery finds children.

  • Breadcrumbs: third parties attach a link back to the anchor (see wiki-breadcrumbs).

  • Examples: adom-desktop, adom-usb.

  • Build it → wiki-family.

Skillpack vs Family — the decision rule

Both involve "a main thing plus many smaller things." The dividing question is ownership and update cadence:

  • Skillpack when one author owns all the parts and they version together. Shipping a new sub-skill means re-publishing the one pack. (The Adom UI design guidelines: one author, one coherent release.)
  • Family when children have independent owners or change on their own cadence. Each child is its own page with its own version, and third parties can publish their own children without touching the anchor.

Worked example: chip-fetcher

chip-fetcher is the instructive edge case. It's open source AND has many per-vendor scraper skills (DigiKey, Mouser, TI, Analog Devices) that change daily as those sites change, and third parties want to own and update the ones they care about.

  • If it were a Skillpack, every vendor tweak would force a re-publish of the whole pack by its single owner — a bottleneck, and third parties couldn't contribute their own scraper without a PR to the core repo.
  • So chip-fetcher is better as a Family: an anchor (chip-fetcher) plus children like chip-fetcher-digikey, chip-fetcher-mouser, each separately publishable and independently owned, discovered via the chip-fetcher-plugin family tag and breadcrumbs. The anchor keeps a registry table of known children.

Rule of thumb: does each part need its own lifecycle and possibly its own author? Yes → Family. No → Skillpack.

Quick chooser

New wiki thing?
├─ One self-contained app/tool/doc?            → Page  (open or closed source)
├─ A set of skills, one owner, ship together?  → Skillpack  (-skillpack suffix)
└─ A hub with parts that have their own        → Family  (anchor + children
   owners / release cadences?                            + family tag + breadcrumbs)