AFS_Adom flight computer molecule

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # AI Flow run: Claude Fable 5.1 on board-0 -**Running**: step `current`, 339.6 min of AI time since the prompt (389.8 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.+**Running**: step `pours`, 347.0 min of AI time since the prompt (397.2 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.  Prompt at 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z (UTC). Flow: board. Every number here is from the run's append-only ledger (run.jsonl). AI time is the time the AI was working on a prompt: from the human's prompt to the AI's done, with any gap over 15 min where no command ran (unobserved, not proven idle) cut out. @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ One row per human prompt: the AI's time on it, unobserved gaps excluded by the h  | Session | Prompt at | Done at | AI time min | Unobserved gap min | What | |---|---|---|---|---|---|-| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 339.6 | 50 | the first prompt |-| **all** | | | **339.6** | | |+| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 346.9 | 50 | the first prompt |+| **all** | | | **347.0** | | |  ## Per step @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | intake | 128.8 | 128.7 | 0.1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 128.7 min | | placement | 28.9 | 8.3 | 20.6 | 79 | 17 | 14 | 3.0 min |-| routing | 140.3 | 52.4 | 87.9 | 92 | 14 | 0 | 13.0 min |-| pours | 6.1 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 min |-| current | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 min |+| routing | 146.2 | 52.4 | 93.8 | 92 | 14 | 0 | 13.0 min |+| pours | 6.1 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0.0 min |+| current | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 min | | capture | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 min | | components | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.3 min | | design | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 min |@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. | sourcing | 6.6 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 min | | test-plan | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1.1 min | | thermal-vias | 6.6 | 0.0 | 6.6 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 min |-| **total** | **339.6** | **209.8** | **129.8** | | | | |+| **total** | **346.9** | **209.8** | **137.1** | | | | |  ## Returns to earlier steps @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T01:35:08Z back to **placement** (visit 15): gate: switch nodes still over budget: BST caps and SW test points placed hard against the inductor SW pads (stubs under 1 mm); BOOTSEL_SW renamed BOOTSEL_BTN (a button line, not a switch node; the gate keys on the name) - 2026-10-16T01:37:18Z back to **test-plan** (visit 2): switch-node test points TP6/TP8 removed: the gate counts their stubs in the switch-node length and a stub on a switch node rings; the SW measurements probe the inductor pad instead - 2026-10-16T03:22:07Z back to **pours** (visit 2): analyze current: VBAT_IN carries 8 A on a 0.5 mm track between the XT30 pin and the shunt; add VBAT_IN pours on both outer layers+- 2026-10-16T03:31:23Z back to **pours** (visit 3): Fields: the 8 A ground return squeezes through an F.Cu neck and 7 stitching gaps; spec.stitchVias was a pitch map, not the explicit point list the planner reads, so no stitching via was planned. 52 GND stitching vias on an 8 mm grid, checked against the live copper  ## Decisions along the way @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T03:22:18Z clip-start:pours-2 - 2026-10-16T03:24:25Z clip-start:outline-2 - 2026-10-16T03:24:48Z clip-start:current-2+- 2026-10-16T03:32:10Z clip-start:pours-3  ## Where the board stands @@ -933,21 +935,43 @@ What this step does: Round the board's corners: every sharp outline corner becom  What this step does: IPC-2221 on every loaded net, pour and via capacity, the same-layer rule; then the AI's own current density drawing and a walkthrough of the pours it judged -**Clip: current, visit 2, still recording (started 2026-10-16T03:24:48Z); it appears here when the step ends.**+**Clip: current, visit 2, the PCB editor from 2026-10-16T03:24:48Z to 2026-10-16T03:31:25Z. Motion only: 6.6 min of real time, 2 s of it had something moving; the clock in the corner is the real elapsed time.**++<video width="100%" controls><source src="/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/current-2.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>++**Contact sheet: nine frames spread through the current, visit 2 clip, what the camera saw.**++![nine frames of current, visit 2](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/current-2-sheet.png)  **Screenshot: the board when current, visit 2 began.**  ![the board when current, visit 2 began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-current-2-start.png) +**Screenshot: the board when current, visit 2 ended.**++![the board when current, visit 2 ended](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-current-2-end.png)++### pours, visit 3 (rework)++What this step does: pour every net the spec names, keepouts along Kelvin taps, thermal and stitching vias, land, measure the copper kept++Why the AI came back here: Fields: the 8 A ground return squeezes through an F.Cu neck and 7 stitching gaps; spec.stitchVias was a pitch map, not the explicit point list the planner reads, so no stitching via was planned. 52 GND stitching vias on an 8 mm grid, checked against the live copper++**Clip: pours, visit 3 (rework), still recording (started 2026-10-16T03:32:10Z); it appears here when the step ends.**++**Screenshot: the board when pours, visit 3 (rework) began.**++![the board when pours, visit 3 (rework) began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-pours-3-start.png)+ ## Plan usage, the second cost line  Percent of each plan limit used, as the provider reports it, at the start of the run and at its end.  | Provider | Limit | At start | At end | Used by this run | |---|---|---|---|---|-| claude | 5h | 17 % | 79 % | 62.0 % |-| claude | Fable | 52 % | 69 % | 17.0 % |-| claude | week | 42 % | 50 % | 8.0 % |+| claude | 5h | 17 % | 83 % | 66.0 % |+| claude | Fable | 52 % | 70 % | 18.0 % |+| claude | week | 42 % | 51 % | 9.0 % |  *The limits are per account, not per run: every AI thread signed in as this user draws on the same numbers, so a run made while other threads were working shows their usage too. Read it as an upper bound unless this run was the only thread active.*