AFS_Adom flight computer molecule

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # AI Flow run: Claude Fable 5.1 on board-0 -**Running**: step `routing`, 276.7 min of AI time since the prompt (276.7 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.+**Running**: step `placement`, 280.6 min of AI time since the prompt (280.6 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.  Prompt at 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z (UTC). Flow: board. Every number here is from the run's append-only ledger (run.jsonl). AI time is the time the AI was working on a prompt: from the human's prompt to the AI's done, with any gap over 15 min where no command ran (unobserved, not proven idle) cut out. @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ One row per human prompt: the AI's time on it, unobserved gaps excluded by the h  | Session | Prompt at | Done at | AI time min | Unobserved gap min | What | |---|---|---|---|---|---|-| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 276.7 | 0 | the first prompt |-| **all** | | | **276.7** | | |+| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 280.6 | 0 | the first prompt |+| **all** | | | **280.6** | | |  ## Per step @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. | Step | AI min | AI thinking min | Tool min | Turns | Visits | Returns | Longest think | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | intake | 128.8 | 128.7 | 0.1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 128.7 min |-| placement | 25.3 | 7.1 | 18.2 | 66 | 14 | 13 | 3.0 min |-| routing | 98.8 | 47.2 | 51.6 | 52 | 11 | 0 | 13.0 min |+| placement | 25.8 | 7.1 | 18.7 | 67 | 15 | 14 | 3.0 min |+| routing | 102.2 | 49.3 | 52.9 | 57 | 11 | 0 | 13.0 min | | capture | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 min | | components | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.3 min | | design | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 min |@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. | simulation | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 min | | sourcing | 6.6 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 min | | test-plan | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.2 min |-| **total** | **276.7** | **202.3** | **74.4** | | | | |+| **total** | **280.6** | **204.4** | **76.2** | | | | |  ## Returns to earlier steps @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T01:13:00Z back to **placement** (visit 12): spare GPIO header J17 moved from the right edge to the top-right beside J16: GPIO28-31 now run straight from the RP2350 top row and the SWD/UART contact column is free - 2026-10-16T01:22:39Z back to **placement** (visit 13): molecule contacts MC9-MC12 (UART0, SWD) moved from the right edge to the bottom edge beside the UART/SWD headers (short routes, right edge freed); MMC5983MA moved to the freed right-edge spot clear of the SD socket; SW2 and R19 shifted - 2026-10-16T01:30:42Z back to **placement** (visit 14): gate: switch nodes 21 mm (budget 8): both bucks re-placed per the AP6320x layout guide - TSOT rotated so the SW pin faces the inductor pad 0.65 mm away, BST cap at pins 5/6, input cap at VIN, output caps at the inductor pad 2; output pours now polygons+- 2026-10-16T01:35:08Z back to **placement** (visit 15): gate: switch nodes still over budget: BST caps and SW test points placed hard against the inductor SW pads (stubs under 1 mm); BOOTSEL_SW renamed BOOTSEL_BTN (a button line, not a switch node; the gate keys on the name)  ## Decisions along the way @@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T01:23:49Z clip-start:routing-10 - 2026-10-16T01:31:28Z clip-start:placement-14 - 2026-10-16T01:31:42Z clip-start:routing-11+- 2026-10-16T01:35:36Z clip-start:placement-15  ## Where the board stands @@ -643,20 +645,38 @@ Why the AI came back here: gate: switch nodes 21 mm (budget 8): both bucks re-pl  What this step does: route to 100 percent with the spec's rules, gate with KiCad's DRC, land as undo steps; the AI takes it with take route=ai -**Clip: routing, visit 11, still recording (started 2026-10-16T01:31:42Z); it appears here when the step ends.**+**Clip: routing, visit 11, the PCB editor from 2026-10-16T01:31:42Z to 2026-10-16T01:35:10Z. Motion only: 3.5 min of real time, 1 s of it had something moving; the clock in the corner is the real elapsed time.**++<video width="100%" controls><source src="/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/routing-11.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>++**Contact sheet: nine frames spread through the routing, visit 11 clip, what the camera saw.**++![nine frames of routing, visit 11](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/routing-11-sheet.png)  **Screenshot: the board when routing, visit 11 began.**  ![the board when routing, visit 11 began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-routing-11-start.png) +### placement, visit 15 (rework)++What this step does: place the parts for routability, current and heat; the binary packs, checks courtyards and lands moves; reserve visible space for connector labels and the two-sided service silkscreen; the switch-node check refuses switch copper under another part or a switch loop longer than the spec allows, and sends the AI back here++Why the AI came back here: gate: switch nodes still over budget: BST caps and SW test points placed hard against the inductor SW pads (stubs under 1 mm); BOOTSEL_SW renamed BOOTSEL_BTN (a button line, not a switch node; the gate keys on the name)++**Clip: placement, visit 15 (rework), still recording (started 2026-10-16T01:35:36Z); it appears here when the step ends.**++**Screenshot: the board when placement, visit 15 (rework) began.**++![the board when placement, visit 15 (rework) began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-placement-15-start.png)+ ## Plan usage, the second cost line  Percent of each plan limit used, as the provider reports it, at the start of the run and at its end.  | Provider | Limit | At start | At end | Used by this run | |---|---|---|---|---|-| claude | 5h | 17 % | 54 % | 37.0 % |-| claude | Fable | 52 % | 62 % | 10.0 % |+| claude | 5h | 17 % | 56 % | 39.0 % |+| claude | Fable | 52 % | 63 % | 11.0 % | | claude | week | 42 % | 47 % | 5.0 % |  *The limits are per account, not per run: every AI thread signed in as this user draws on the same numbers, so a run made while other threads were working shows their usage too. Read it as an upper bound unless this run was the only thread active.*