AFS_Adom flight computer molecule

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # AI Flow run: Claude Fable 5.1 on board-0 -**Running**: step `routing`, 232.6 min of AI time since the prompt (232.6 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.+**Running**: step `placement`, 240.9 min of AI time since the prompt (240.9 min on the wall clock). This page updates at every step change.  Prompt at 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z (UTC). Flow: board. Every number here is from the run's append-only ledger (run.jsonl). AI time is the time the AI was working on a prompt: from the human's prompt to the AI's done, with any gap over 15 min where no command ran (unobserved, not proven idle) cut out. @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ One row per human prompt: the AI's time on it, unobserved gaps excluded by the h  | Session | Prompt at | Done at | AI time min | Unobserved gap min | What | |---|---|---|---|---|---|-| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 232.6 | 0 | the first prompt |-| **all** | | | **232.6** | | |+| 1 | 2026-10-15T20:55:00Z | (open) | 240.9 | 0 | the first prompt |+| **all** | | | **240.9** | | |  ## Per step @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. | Step | AI min | AI thinking min | Tool min | Turns | Visits | Returns | Longest think | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | intake | 128.8 | 128.7 | 0.1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 128.7 min |-| placement | 18.0 | 6.6 | 11.3 | 45 | 8 | 7 | 3.0 min |-| routing | 62.0 | 33.4 | 28.6 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 13.0 min |+| placement | 18.5 | 6.6 | 11.8 | 46 | 9 | 8 | 3.0 min |+| routing | 69.8 | 36.4 | 33.5 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 13.0 min | | capture | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 min | | components | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.3 min | | design | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 min |@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. | simulation | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 min | | sourcing | 6.6 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 min | | test-plan | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.2 min |-| **total** | **232.6** | **188.0** | **44.5** | | | | |+| **total** | **240.9** | **191.0** | **49.9** | | | | |  ## Returns to earlier steps @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T00:26:14Z back to **placement** (visit 6): RP2350 fan-out pre-routed as board copper (3-row via fan-out, standard for 0.4 mm QFN); IOVDD/DVDD caps moved 0.1 mm out for hole clearance to the row-C vias; C27 kept at its explicit spot - 2026-10-16T00:44:53Z back to **placement** (visit 7): RP2350 fan-out reworked: D/A/C two-row via pattern (one B.Cu escape per row-C gap) with hand-routed crystal and DVDD(32) traces; crystal group 0.9 mm up, C26 flipped, QSPI/USB-OTP caps east of the USB pair, C4 clear of the crystal, right-side caps 0.3 mm out - 2026-10-16T00:47:15Z back to **placement** (visit 8): RP2350 fan-out reworked: D/A/C two-row via pattern (one B.Cu escape per row-C gap) with hand-routed crystal and DVDD(32) traces; crystal group 0.9 mm up, C26 flipped, QSPI/USB-OTP caps east of the USB pair, C4 clear of the crystal and U13, right-side caps 0.3 mm out+- 2026-10-16T00:55:25Z back to **placement** (visit 9): top-side direct stubs lengthened to 8.0 mm so a via fits clear of the escape ends; crystal group lifted to 124.8 so XOUT/DVDD traces clear the crystal GND pad; GND-under-crystal B.Cu keepout dropped (In1 GND shields)  ## Decisions along the way @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ AI time only, the idle cut out. - 2026-10-16T00:45:15Z clip-start:placement-7 - 2026-10-16T00:47:20Z clip-start:placement-8 - 2026-10-16T00:47:32Z clip-start:routing-6+- 2026-10-16T00:55:52Z clip-start:placement-9  ## Where the board stands @@ -418,20 +420,38 @@ Why the AI came back here: RP2350 fan-out reworked: D/A/C two-row via pattern (o  What this step does: route to 100 percent with the spec's rules, gate with KiCad's DRC, land as undo steps; the AI takes it with take route=ai -**Clip: routing, visit 6, still recording (started 2026-10-16T00:47:32Z); it appears here when the step ends.**+**Clip: routing, visit 6, the PCB editor from 2026-10-16T00:47:32Z to 2026-10-16T00:55:26Z. Motion only: 7.9 min of real time, 18 s of it had something moving; the clock in the corner is the real elapsed time.**++<video width="100%" controls><source src="/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/routing-6.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>++**Contact sheet: nine frames spread through the routing, visit 6 clip, what the camera saw.**++![nine frames of routing, visit 6](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/routing-6-sheet.png)  **Screenshot: the board when routing, visit 6 began.**  ![the board when routing, visit 6 began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-routing-6-start.png) +### placement, visit 9 (rework)++What this step does: place the parts for routability, current and heat; the binary packs, checks courtyards and lands moves; reserve visible space for connector labels and the two-sided service silkscreen; the switch-node check refuses switch copper under another part or a switch loop longer than the spec allows, and sends the AI back here++Why the AI came back here: top-side direct stubs lengthened to 8.0 mm so a via fits clear of the escape ends; crystal group lifted to 124.8 so XOUT/DVDD traces clear the crystal GND pad; GND-under-crystal B.Cu keepout dropped (In1 GND shields)++**Clip: placement, visit 9 (rework), still recording (started 2026-10-16T00:55:52Z); it appears here when the step ends.**++**Screenshot: the board when placement, visit 9 (rework) began.**++![the board when placement, visit 9 (rework) began](/blob/app/afs-adom/docs/runs/AFS_Adom-claude-fable-5-1-20261015-2055/shot-placement-9-start.png)+ ## Plan usage, the second cost line  Percent of each plan limit used, as the provider reports it, at the start of the run and at its end.  | Provider | Limit | At start | At end | Used by this run | |---|---|---|---|---|-| claude | 5h | 17 % | 47 % | 30.0 % |-| claude | Fable | 52 % | 60 % | 8.0 % |+| claude | 5h | 17 % | 48 % | 31.0 % |+| claude | Fable | 52 % | 61 % | 9.0 % | | claude | week | 42 % | 46 % | 4.0 % |  *The limits are per account, not per run: every AI thread signed in as this user draws on the same numbers, so a run made while other threads were working shows their usage too. Read it as an upper bound unless this run was the only thread active.*