KiCad - the KiCad Bridge
Public Made by Adomby adom
Drive your own KiCad from an AI, in the background: open every editor, read the whole board as data (the EDA Bridge Standard board model), stack-up, part heights, netlists, place, route, pour, DRC and exports.
0.9.340 shipped archive contains five runtime handler changes absent from master
The shipped insiders 0.9.340 archive does not match the latest master source for five runtime handlers, beyond expected version/package metadata.
Verified 2026-09-07: download https://wiki.adom.inc/download/adom/kicad-bridge/0.9.340/adom-bridge-kicad-v0.9.340.zip has SHA256 84c6b60b8cc484c502e2cc78274c9016957f0aeb9f5a34ec82b83b89f7dce68f, exactly the insiders manifest. Current master is 96b31b3ac62c922e0da80ea4a377adfb3cad8ee5 (Publish 1.0.127). Source clone reports complete. Direct repo show at that commit agrees for server.py and BRIDGE_VERSION.
Differing runtime source files: handlers/demo.py (559 diff lines), handlers/open_footprint_editor.py (96), handlers/kicad_ui.py (87), handlers/kicad_windows.py (34), handlers/install_footprint.py (30). Archive has substantial tour/window/library fixes absent from master. Other differences: BRIDGE_VERSION (master 0.9.317, zip 0.9.340), bridge.json, package.json, page.json.
The routing handler in the archive matches master, so routing PR #3 remains based on the right routing code. The concern is reproducibility and loss of shipped tour fixes in a future rebuild from master. Please land the exact tested runtime source and reconcile the version metadata. Attached diff is master to released archive, not a proposal to roll anything back.
Hosts ConfRoomROG, arav-rog, winvm all report runtime 0.9.340 on AB 2.1.68. Runtime tests are ongoing; this report is a source/archive mismatch, not a claim those shipped handlers fail.