KiCad - the KiCad Bridge

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, ThreadingHTTPServer from pathlib import Path from urllib.parse import unquote, urlparse -VERSION = "4.3.0"+VERSION = "4.3.1" AI_THREAD = "kicad-dashboard" DEFAULT_PORT = 8931 UI_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parent / "ui"

@@ -427,12 +427,23 @@      * column while the other three rendered TWO, at an identical pane width. The panel was      * conformant in all four; the PAGE around it was not. The fleet gutter is 16px a side,      * so the panel's border box is the pane minus 32. */-    var vw = document.documentElement.clientWidth;-    var want32 = vw - 32, gotW = Math.round(panel.getBoundingClientRect().width);+    /* Measure against the panel's OWN CONTAINING BLOCK, never documentElement.+     * The first version compared to documentElement.clientWidth, which silently assumes the+     * PAGE scrolls. An app-shell dashboard (position:fixed shell, 44px header, scroller on an+     * inner .app-body) has no document scrollbar, so clientWidth is the full pane and the+     * inner scrollbar is charged to content instead: a correctly built app-shell page fails+     * by exactly one scrollbar width, and only pages that happen to scroll at document level+     * pass. Since app-shell is the prescribed structure, the check was failing the apps that+     * followed the skill. The containing block is scrollbar-agnostic and still catches the+     * real defect, which is a page adding its own padding around the mount point.+     * (parts-search, 2026-08-25, from reading the implementation rather than the prose.) */+    var host = (panel.parentElement && panel.parentElement.parentElement) || document.body;+    var hostW = host.clientWidth;+    var want32 = hostW - 32, gotW = Math.round(panel.getBoundingClientRect().width);     var gutterOk = Math.abs(gotW - want32) <= 2;     if (!gutterOk) ok = false;-    rows.push({ what: 'panel gutter', want: want32 + 'px wide (16px a side)',-                got: gotW + 'px (' + Math.round((vw - gotW) / 2) + 'px a side)', pass: gutterOk });+    rows.push({ what: 'panel gutter', want: want32 + 'px wide (16px a side of its container)',+                got: gotW + 'px (' + Math.round((hostW - gotW) / 2) + 'px a side)', pass: gutterOk });     var fam = getComputedStyle(panel.querySelector('.anp-phrase span') || panel).fontFamily;     var famOk = /Satoshi/.test(fam);     if (!famOk) ok = false;@@ -440,6 +451,6 @@     return { ok: ok, rows: rows };   } -  root.AdomNewbiePanel = { mount: mount, toast: toast, selfCheck: selfCheck, version: '2.3.0',+  root.AdomNewbiePanel = { mount: mount, toast: toast, selfCheck: selfCheck, version: '2.4.0',                            TWO_COL_MIN: TWO_COL_MIN, PHRASE_BUDGET: PHRASE_BUDGET }; })(typeof window !== 'undefined' ? window : this);

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ {   "slug": "kicad-bridge",-  "version": "1.0.95",+  "version": "1.0.96",   "type": "app",   "description": "Skills for your container so your AI knows how to drive the KiCad bridge. The bridge runtime itself is the release zip; Adom Bridge loads that.",   "tags": [

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@   "slug": "kicad-bridge",   "title": "KiCad - the KiCad Bridge",   "brief": "Reference implementation of the KiCad bridge — multi-instance Python server, forward path via kicad-cli, reverse path via in-process plugin. Most complex of the three bundled bridges.",-  "version": "1.0.95",+  "version": "1.0.96",   "tags": [     "kicad",     "pcb",