component

INA228AIDGSR

Public Made by Adom

by adom

Texas Instruments Power Supply Controllers, Monitors, VSSOP-10-0.5mm. KiCad symbol, footprint and 3D as used on Adom boards; pin functions from the manufacturer datasheet.

componentamplifiers/comparatorsina228aidgsrboard-derived

Verified INA228AIDGSR

by Claude, at Caleb Taylor's request · last 27 Oct 2026 · 1 record · files match
SymbolFootprint3D modelPins

Verification log 5 records

27 Oct 2026Claude, at Caleb Taylor's requestValidated against TI's INA228 datasheet (SLYS021A, revised May 2022)files match
SymbolFootprint3D modelPinsfor all variants
  • ✓Datasheet: the page already carries TI's current edition (SLYS021A, revised May 2022; sha256 matches ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ina228.pdf fetched 2026-10-27)
  • ✓All 10 pins match Table 5-1 and Figure 5-1 (p.3) by number and name; renamed to the datasheet's spelling: 3 ~{Alert} -> ALERT (no overbar in the datasheet), 8 Vbus -> VBUS, 9 Vin- -> IN-, 10 Vin+ -> IN+ (the datasheet prints IN– with a typographic dash)
  • ✓Pin types agree with Table 5-1: A0/A1/SCL inputs, SDA bidirectional, ALERT open-drain output, VBUS/IN+/IN- analog inputs, VS/GND power
  • ✓Pins 9 and 10 described from Table 5-1; every description cites p.3
  • ✓Footprint vs DGS0010A (p.45-46): 10 pads 1.45 x 0.30 mm at e = 0.50 mm, as TI's land pattern example; pad centres 4.30 mm apart vs TI's (4.4) reference, both cover the lead (E 4.75-5.05, L 0.4-0.7); pad width 0.30 over b 0.17-0.27; no exposed pad; pin 1 top-left
  • ✓3D body 4.90 x 3.00 x 1.10 mm against E 4.75-5.05 (lead span), D 2.9-3.1, A 1.1 max; Z-up, seated on z = 0, centred on the pads
  • ✓DigiKey 296-INA228AIDGSRTR-ND and Mouser 595-INA228AIDGSR present
  • ✓Symbol Datasheet / MPN / Manufacturer / DigiKey / Mouser / LCSC properties agree with page.json; footprint Datasheet property points at the manufacturer datasheet URL
  • ✓component-page-verify: all checks pass; adom-lbr validate OK
Evidencedatasheet (Texas Instruments)
Verified files✓ ina228aidgsr.kicad_sym✓ ina228aidgsr.kicad_mod✓ ina228aidgsr.step
8 Oct 2026Claude (AI build)Datasheet pins not matched to a symbol pin: IN+, IN-superseded
reviewfor all variants
  • •Datasheet pins not matched to a symbol pin: IN+, IN-
8 Oct 2026Claude (AI build)Pin names differ between the board symbol and the datasheet (often equivalent naming; chec...superseded
reviewfor all variants
  • •Pin names differ between the board symbol and the datasheet (often equivalent naming; check): 9: symbol "Vin-" vs datasheet "IN-"; 10: symbol "Vin+" vs datasheet "IN+"
8 Oct 2026Claude (AI build)2 of 10 pins have no datasheet description yet (pins 9, 10).superseded
reviewfor all variants
  • •2 of 10 pins have no datasheet description yet (pins 9, 10).
8 Oct 2026Claude (AI build)Automated build checks (awaiting human validation)superseded
SymbolFootprint3D modelPinsfor all variants
  • ✓Footprint extracted pad-for-pad from the source board and normalized to the footprint frame (back-side parts un-mirrored)
  • ✓3D model seated z=0 at footprint origin (placement inverse; method centroid-matched to KiCad library models on 59 cases)
  • ✓adom-lbr generate + lint passed
  • •8 of 10 pins described from the datasheet (adom-ds2sf, page-cited)
  • •Not yet checked by a person: land pattern vs datasheet, pin-1/orientation, 3D body vs drawing
Evidencedatasheet
Verified files! ina228aidgsr.kicad_sym✓ ina228aidgsr.kicad_mod✓ ina228aidgsr.step
Spot something wrong? Report it as an issue Propose a fix Records are signed by members of adom.
Overview Files Discover Packages Releases Dependencies Issues Breadcrumbs Pull Requests Activity

Discover

How an AI finds this repo: the auto-discovery snippet from page.json, self-tested against the live discovery search.

Snippet

discovery_triggers
ina228aidgsrina228aidgsr
discovery_pitch

INA228AIDGSR (Texas Instruments) component page: pinout, KiCad symbol, footprint and 3D.

tags
componentamplifiers/comparatorsina228aidgsrboard-derived
sample_prompts
none declared

Sample prompts: self-test

Your own triggers, combined #1 of 1

How this repo ranks when its full trigger set is the query.

No sample_prompts declared in page.json, so there is nothing to self-test. Add a few real user utterances to sample_prompts to litmus-test your discoverability.