← Commit history

Lead the Fusion progression with independent placement and native 3D comparison

John Lauer ·3e871fbfb5 ·28d ago ·parent 7504495
2 files changed +12−2
README.md+5−1
@@ -8,7 +8,11 @@ - **Place components:** work with the connected EDA application's placement controls, accounting for pad access, clearances, routing space, and power/return paths. Inspect the actual board and preserve the original before making changes. - **Review the electrical design:** examine power copper, return paths, thermal bottlenecks, and multilayer connectivity alongside the routing geometry. -The recordings below demonstrate trace routing and electrical review. Their rerouting comparisons retain the original component placement; they are not demonstrations of automatic placement optimization. The EDA workflows run from Codex in Hydrogen through the relevant application bridges and do not require Codex Desktop or the separate Codex Bridge described later.+The latest BQ example demonstrates independent placement, routing and native 3D comparison. Earlier rerouting recordings retain the original component placement. The EDA workflows run from Codex in Hydrogen through the relevant application bridges and do not require Codex Desktop or the separate Codex Bridge described later.++## Latest: Astra places, routes and compares the board in 3D++[Watch the narrated 4:12 meeting video and read the method](https://wiki.adom.inc/adom/codex/files/docs/BQ-PLACEMENT-ROUTING-3D.md). All 109 elements were moved off-board before a fresh placement; the ending compares Adonis and Astra in native Fusion 3D.  ## EDA guides 
docs/ASTRA-FUSION.md+7−1
@@ -6,7 +6,13 @@ These videos document the progression of Codex Astra driving Autodesk Fusion thr  The BQ25792 comparison disables one inherited all-object same-net spacing rule on diagnostic copies because it conflicts with intended same-net connections. Other clearance rules remain enabled and the source is preserved. Native DRC verifies the encoded rules; it does not certify power, thermal, signal-integrity or insulation safety. -## Latest team overview: released routing, verified checks+## 13. Independent placement, routing and native 3D comparison++<video width="100%" controls playsinline preload="metadata" poster="https://wiki.adom.inc/api/pages/adom/codex/files/docs/bq-placement-3d-poster.png" src="https://wiki.adom.inc/api/pages/adom/codex/files/videos/fusion/13-bq-astra-placement-routing-3d.mp4"></video>++**4:12, narrated.** Astra starts with all components off-board, calculates placement and four-layer routes, and compares complete native Fusion 3D assemblies. The 3D ending begins at **2:46**. [Meeting page, measured results and reproduction prompt](https://wiki.adom.inc/adom/codex/files/docs/BQ-PLACEMENT-ROUTING-3D.md). This run has its own rule profile and final checks; earlier diagnostic results below are historical.++## Earlier team overview: released routing, verified checks  This newly narrated short reel follows the progression from simple routing to the BQ25792 board, retained copper, thermal planning, expanded pours and bottleneck rerouting. Historical native Fusion footage retains its 10× action labels and inspection holds. The updated ending reflects the independent release checks: six-net per-trace routing completed in 55.1 seconds on 1.10.2; the saved fixture then passed the corrected, unmodified InstaPCB 2L profile with zero errors, warnings or airwires on 1.10.5, and explicit net highlighting was visually verified.