Adom UI Design System

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ {   "slug": "adom-ui-design",-  "version": "1.30.0",+  "version": "1.31.0",   "type": "skill",   "description": "The Adom UI Design System plus a bundle of focused UI skills (tooltips, floating-windows, toasts, responsive-ui, app-shell, ai-driven-apps, clickable-paths, dark-default, input-feedback, settings-layout). One install drops the whole set of skill files onto your container, plus shared icon assets (the settings cog) so every Adom app draws the same glyph.",   "dependencies": {},

@@ -111,7 +111,21 @@ your dashboard a `GET /api/viewport` that reports its OWN `window.innerWidth`, `scrollWidth`, `overflowX` and `devicePixelRatio` back to whoever asks.  Then "how wide is the user's pane" stops being an assumption you carry and becomes a fact you-can fetch, and horizontal overflow reports itself instead of waiting to be noticed. It also+can fetch, and horizontal overflow reports itself instead of waiting to be noticed.++**Make it name the OFFENDERS, not just report a number.** kicad's version walks the DOM and+returns which elements exceed the viewport, e.g. `#targetChip:w135,r302` and+`.actions:w100,r410`. That turns "something overflows at 236px" into a culprit list, and it+is how it found that its overflow was in the HEADER (a nowrap brand plus a 135px target chip+plus four ghost buttons) while the panel everyone suspected fitted fine. A symptom sends you+looking; a culprit list sends you fixing.++**A width matrix run in a harness is MEASUREMENT, not verification.** Driving fixed-width+iframes of your own page proves how your CSS cascade behaves and is worth doing across the+whole band. It does not prove anything about the user's surface, so label it as the harness+result it is, and keep the claim "this is what the user sees" for frames captured in their+ah. Preferably run the harness as an in-page iframe INSIDE ah so even the measurement happens+on the real surface. It also gives you an attributable answer: a width you measured through your own page in the user's ah is evidence, where a width you assumed is not.