Adom UI Design System

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ {   "slug": "adom-ui-design",-  "version": "2.17.0",+  "version": "2.18.0",   "type": "skill",   "description": "The Adom UI Design System plus a bundle of focused UI skills (tooltips, floating-windows, toasts, responsive-ui, app-shell, ai-driven-apps, clickable-paths, dark-default, input-feedback, settings-layout). One install drops the whole set of skill files onto your container, plus shared icon assets (the settings cog) so every Adom app draws the same glyph.",   "dependencies": {},

@@ -1170,6 +1170,47 @@ actually holds: The general form, worth more than the panel: **on a shared resource, a handoff is not complete when the holder lets go. It is complete when the next holder has been told, by the holder.** +## ⛔ "CURRENT" IS THREE SEPARATE CLAIMS, AND ANY ONE OF THEM CAN LIE ALONE++parts-search hit all three in a single slot:++| claim | how it lies |+|---|---|+| **the INSTALLED version** | `pkg install` succeeded, so the binary on disk is new |+| **the RUNNING process version** | the old process is still serving: 2.0.7 installed, **2.0.3 running** |+| **the version the DOCUMENT has** | `open-or-refresh` reported success while the page **stayed on module 2.1.1** |++Only a reload from inside the page moved the third one. So verifying an install proves the+first, `/api/status` proves the second, and **only `AdomNewbiePanel.version` read out of the+live document proves the third.** Report all three or you are reporting one and implying the+others.++## Two margins at John's width, neither a defect today, both worth watching++parts-search measured these on his box and flagged them rather than reporting a clean pass:++- **THE PANEL IS 702px AGAINST A 699px COLLAPSE THRESHOLD. Three pixels.** Pane 744, scroller+  client box 734 (a 10px scrollbar), panel 702. **A 13px scrollbar instead of 10 collapses that+  dashboard to one column with nothing in its code changing.** The container query is measured+  on a box a platform detail contributes to, so the margin is not entirely ours.+- **The longest phrase is 332px in a 343px box: 11px of headroom**, on "check ESP32-S3-WROOM-1+  stock". The 0-of-6 is real and it is not comfortable.++At his width the two-column layout is close to its limit on BOTH axes. Nothing to change+today; something to check first if a dashboard ever renders one column unexpectedly.++## ⛔ PUT A POSITIVE CONTROL ON A CLEAN RESULT, NOT ONLY A NEGATIVE ONE ON A CHECK++parts-search has reported "0 of 6 truncating" on this exact question before, when the truth was+2 of 6, by measuring the cell instead of the clipping span. **All six spans returning an+identical 343 is what a dead instrument looks like.** So before believing the clean result it+lengthened one span in place and watched `scrollWidth` go 343 -> 823 -> 343. **It responds to+text, therefore the reading is real.**++The distinction is worth holding: a NEGATIVE control proves a check can fail. A POSITIVE+control proves a measurement is still connected to the thing it measures. **Its wrong version+of that number looked exactly like its right one**, and only the poke told them apart.+ ## FIRST: WHICH LIFECYCLE IS YOUR DASHBOARD ON? THEY ARE NOT THE SAME PROBLEM.  **A container-served dashboard** runs as its own process. `pkg install` replaces the binary and