skill
Adom UI Design System
Public Made by Adomby adom
How the AI builds and tests interfaces people love to use in Adom. Ships as one installable skill that bundles focused skills (tooltips, floating-windows, toasts, responsive-ui, app-shell, ai-driven-apps, clickable-paths).
← Commit history
2.3.2 (doc only, module bytes unchanged): evidence expires - re-check that a rule's justification still exists before citing it
2 files changed
+24−1
package.json+1−1@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { "slug": "adom-ui-design",- "version": "2.3.1",+ "version": "2.3.2", "type": "skill", "description": "The Adom UI Design System plus a bundle of focused UI skills (tooltips, floating-windows, toasts, responsive-ui, app-shell, ai-driven-apps, clickable-paths, dark-default, input-feedback, settings-layout). One install drops the whole set of skill files onto your container, plus shared icon assets (the settings cog) so every Adom app draws the same glyph.", "dependencies": {},
skills/newbie-panel/SKILL.md+23@@ -229,6 +229,29 @@ Deleting your hand-rolled panel is the part that breaks pages, not mounting the happened to be right while the install path was broken. `curl` your own route back and compare its sha256 to the pack's. +### ⛔ EVIDENCE EXPIRES. RE-CHECK THAT A RULE'S JUSTIFICATION STILL EXISTS BEFORE CITING IT++The 700 threshold was argued hardest on nb's install phrase, a 426px string that truncated in+every two-column configuration measured below 1280px. **That phrase no longer exists.** nb+shortened it to 216px under the authoring rule, so its longest is now 267px, comfortably+inside the budget.++Nothing about that measurement was ever wrong. The phrase truncated exactly as measured. The+evidence was **removed by a later fix**, so it stopped describing anything that ships, while+still sitting in the skill reading like a live argument.++**This is a different failure mode from every other trap on this page.** The rest are about+instruments that were wrong, or measured the wrong thing, or ran in the wrong environment.+This one is about a correct measurement of a thing that no longer exists. It cannot be caught+by re-running the check, because the check still passes; it can only be caught by asking+whether the case it describes is still real.++So when you cite a measurement to justify a rule, **verify the case still ships**, not merely+that the number was true when taken. 700 survives this test because parts-search's independent+measurement (two of six truncating at 744 two-column, with the trigger noun clipped) still+describes phrases in the current build. Had nb's string been the only evidence, the number+would have needed re-deriving rather than re-citing.+ ### ⛔ A GREEN CHECK IS WORTH NOTHING UNTIL YOU HAVE SEEN IT GO RED Before you trust any check you just wrote, **break the thing it is checking and watch it