← Commit history

aiflow comparison docs/comparisons/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914-vs-source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314: Claude Fable 5.1 versus Codex (Astra)

John Lauer ·e384ee602e ·22d ago ·parent f87a859
1 file changed +2−2
docs/comparisons/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914-vs-source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314/README.md+2−2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@-# Claude Fable 5.1 versus Codex (Astra) on esc-g431-unplaced+# Claude Fable 5.1 versus Codex (Astra) on the ESC G431  Two AIs, the same board, the same spec, the same prompt, the same flow (Adom's AI Flow), measured the same way: the AI's own time from the prompt to "done, here is your video", every return to an earlier step, every clip, and the analysis each AI did itself. Nobody had put two engines through one measured board flow before; this page is the first pair. @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Two AIs, the same board, the same spec, the same prompt, the same flow (Adom's A  | | AI time to delivery | Returns to earlier steps | Turns | AI thinking min | Binary min | |---|---|---|---|---|---|-| **Claude Fable 5.1** | **53.4 min** | 2 | 208 | 26.7 | 56.3 |+| **Claude Fable 5.1** | **53.4 min** | 2 | 209 | 26.7 | 56.3 | | **Codex (Astra)** | **78.5 min** | 14 | 186 | 61.7 | 107.4 |  AI time is the sum of the run's sessions, one per human prompt, from the prompt to the AI's done, with every idle gap over 15 minutes (the human away) cut out. Follow-up prompts after delivery (the walkthroughs, the drawings, the re-cuts) are on each run's page under Sessions and are not in the delivery number.