← Commit history

README: the narrated comparison cut

John Lauer ·a355a5ed7e ·22d ago ·parent 07b8968
1 file changed +1−1
README.md+1−1
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ The evidence of a run is its video, two minutes at most: only the moments someth  **The first pair: Claude Fable 5.1 versus Codex (Astra) on the ESC G431.** Same board, same spec, same prompt, same flow, measured the same way. [The comparison page](docs/comparisons/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914-vs-source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314/README.md) leads with the side-by-side video and links both runs in full. -<video width="100%" controls><source src="/blob/app/adom-aiflow/docs/comparisons/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914-vs-source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314/comparison-20260915162905.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>+<video width="100%" controls><source src="/blob/app/adom-aiflow/docs/comparisons/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914-vs-source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314/comparison-20260915221452.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>  *Fable delivered in 53 min of AI time with 2 returns to earlier steps; Astra in 78 min with 14. The runs: [Fable](docs/runs/board-claude-fable-5-1-20260914/README.md), [Astra](docs/runs/source-unplaced-codex-astra-20260914-0314/README.md).*